This blog post and the “Deep Dive” podcast on a paper “A pause in the weakening of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation since the early 2010s” by Lee et al. (2024) was created by NotebookLM.
Deep Dive Podcast “Atlantic Current Stability Is Borrowed Time” powered by NotebookLM:
Introduction: The Ocean’s Alarming Story Just Got More Complicated
For years, climate scientists have issued stark warnings about the weakening of a critical ocean system: the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC). Better known as the ocean’s “global conveyor belt,” the AMOC is a powerhouse of ocean currents that transports heat and nutrients around the globe, fundamentally shaping our climate. The consensus from climate models has been clear and concerning: human activity is causing this vital system to slow down, with potentially dramatic consequences for regional climate and sea levels. This system is not just a weather-maker; it’s a critical ally in the fight against climate change, as it pulls a significant amount of human-caused carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and buries it in the deep ocean.
But a new, detailed analysis reveals a surprising twist in this story. While models project a steady, human-caused decline, direct observations tell a different tale. For the last two decades, and especially since the early 2010s, the AMOC has shown remarkable resilience. Instead of continuing its slowdown, its weakening has effectively hit pause.
This apparent contradiction has created a puzzle for scientists. Is the threat of a weakening AMOC overblown, or is something else at play? New research untangles this mystery, revealing a fascinating “tug-of-war” between powerful natural forces and the underlying, persistent impact of human-induced climate change. What we’re seeing isn’t a reversal of the danger, but a temporary and complex standoff.
Takeaway 1: The Ocean’s “Conveyor Belt” Has Hit Pause on Its Decline
The central finding of the new research is that the AMOC has shown “remarkable resilience” in the face of pressures expected to weaken it. Continuous, direct observations over the past two decades have revealed a “near stalling of the AMOC weakening,” a trend that is particularly pronounced since the early 2010s.
To put a number on it, the data shows that the trend of weakening was virtually non-existent during the period from 2011 to 2021, measuring just −0.1 Sv per decade (a Sverdrup, or Sv, is a unit of flow). This resilience is not just an artifact of a few anomalous years; even when researchers removed the first two years of strong data from the record, the weakening trend from 2007 to 2021 was still only −0.2 Sv per decade. This is a striking observation because it runs counter to the projections of state-of-the-art climate models, which suggest a significant and ongoing weakening of the AMOC driven by anthropogenic forcing. The real-world data shows a system that, for now, is holding its ground.
Takeaway 2: It’s a “Tug-of-War” Between Nature and Human-Induced Weakening
The explanation for this surprising pause can be best understood as a climatic “tug-of-war.” The AMOC is being pulled in two opposite directions by two powerful forces: one natural and one human-caused.
- Anthropogenic Forcing (The Weakening Signal): This is the long-term trend driven by human activities, primarily increased CO2 emissions and reduced aerosol loading in the atmosphere. This force is consistently pulling on the AMOC, pushing it toward a weaker state.
- Natural Variability (The Strengthening Signal): In recent years, a powerful natural climate pattern known as a “strong positive North Atlantic Oscillation” (NAO) has emerged. This natural cycle has had the opposite effect, creating conditions that strengthen the AMOC.
Since the early 2010s, this strengthening signal from nature has been strong enough to “oppose the anthropogenic weakening signal.” The result is the observed stalemate, or pause, in the AMOC’s decline. The two forces are pulling with nearly equal strength, so the rope has stopped moving. However, this balance is likely temporary, a crucial point for understanding future climate stability.
Our analysis suggests that the tug-of-war between the natural and anthropogenic signals will likely continue in the next several years.
Takeaway 3: The Cause of the 2000s Slowdown Wasn’t What We Thought
This new analysis also rewrites our understanding of the AMOC’s recent past. The “conventional argument” among scientists was that the AMOC’s reduction after its peak around the year 2000 was largely caused by a concurrent weakening of the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO). In other words, nature was thought to be the main culprit for that decade’s slowdown.
However, this new study finds that the slowdown observed from 2000 to 2020 was, in fact, primarily driven by external, human-caused forcing. During this period, the natural component was actually working to mitigate or lessen the human-caused weakening. As the researchers state, based on their primary climate model (CESM2), “the external forcing is the sole driver of the AMOC slowdown from 2000 to 2020.”
However, the researchers note this finding is sensitive to the climate model used, with other leading models suggesting that natural variability also contributed to the slowdown during that decade. This highlights the complexity of separating natural from human-caused signals and gives us a window into the ongoing scientific effort to refine our understanding of these massive Earth systems.
Takeaway 4: Nature’s Influence Has a Delayed Effect
One of the keys to understanding this dynamic is that the AMOC does not respond instantly to changes in the NAO. The research describes the system as having a “time-integrated & delayed response to the NAO.”
In simple terms, when a strong phase of the NAO occurs, its strengthening effect on the ocean circulation doesn’t just happen and then disappear. Instead, the momentum builds over time, and the strengthening effect can persist and even intensify for years after the NAO itself has returned to a more neutral state. It’s like pushing a heavy flywheel; it continues to spin long after you’ve stopped pushing. This delayed reaction explains why the natural strengthening component has remained so robust, allowing it to effectively counteract the persistent, human-caused weakening signal for the past decade.
Conclusion: A Temporary Reprieve, Not a Reversal
The current stability in the Atlantic’s great conveyor belt is a critical and fascinating development, but it should not be mistaken for a sign that the long-term threat has vanished. The research makes it clear that what we are witnessing is a temporary standoff, where a period of strong natural variability is masking the underlying human-driven trend. The analysis suggests this highly elevated natural state “is unlikely to dissipate away during the next several years.”
Ultimately, the long-term projections remain unchanged. The human-caused, external forcing that pushes the AMOC toward a weaker state is expected to continue throughout the 21st century. It’s important to note that scientists are working with imperfect tools; the models used in this study don’t yet fully account for factors like the rapid melting of Greenland’s ice sheet, which could further accelerate the AMOC’s long-term decline. The current pause is a reprieve, but the tug-of-war is not over. The fundamental pressure on this vital climate system continues to build.
With models still working to capture the full picture and human-caused pressures mounting, the real question is not just when this natural reprieve will end, but whether we will be prepared for the speed and severity of the AMOC’s response when it does.
Figure generated by Notebook LM infographic.
Lee, S.-K., Kim, D., Gomez, F.A., Lopez, H., Volkov, D.L., Dong, S., Lumpkin, R. & Yeager, S. A pause in the weakening of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation since the early 2010s. Nat Commun 15, 10642 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-54903-w
Ocean to Climate 
Leave a comment